Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma (excluding T-cell redirection therapy)
Category: Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma (excluding T-cell redirection therapy)
Understanding different treatment (Tx) goals and experiences according to characteristics in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)
Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD
Consultant Haematologist
NIHR UCLH Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Tx choices in RRMM pose challenges due to patient (pt) and disease heterogeneity. Personalizing the approach to decision-making and Tx choice based on understanding these differences may help improve the overall pt experience and relationships with health care professionals (HCPs).
Methods:
To better understand the unmet need within pt groups, 30-min online surveys were conducted across 7 countries (March-June 2024). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and χ2 tests (P<.01 for comparisons, unless specified).
Results:
Pts with RRMM (n=1301) and oncologists (n=983) participated. Multivariate analysis identified that financial burden, age, and comorbidities are significantly associated with a Tx meeting pt expectations.
Pts with high financial burden prioritized slowing down disease (57% v 42%), limiting side effects (AEs; 57% v 34%), and limiting costs (40% v 26%). Their Tx experience was reported to be significantly worse than expected v more financially stable pts.
The greatest priorities for pts aged ≥65 y was limiting AEs (53% v 33% for pts <65 y) and slowing disease progression (53% v 40%). They faced worse physical burdens (78% v 69%, P=.024) and their Tx experience was worse than expected for quality of life (QOL; 53% v 20%), AEs (59% v 19%), and mental health (56% v 21%). Emotional/mental burden was not significantly different.
Pts with ≥3 comorbidities faced more physical and emotional burdens and experienced worse than expected Tx outcomes than pts with <3 comorbidities (36%-60% v 33%-43%), notably QOL (60% v 38%). Pts with ≥3 comorbidities ranked limiting costs (39%), limiting AEs (53%), and slowing disease worsening (55%) over living longer (30%).
Fewer females v males were in remission (27% v 42%). Not being in remission was strongly associated with females feeling greater physical burden (78% v 73%, P=.035) and with Tx outcomes being worse than expected for females, including for perceived efficacy (42% v 32%), impact on mental health (52% v 39%) and QOL (50% v 37%), and females facing more financial difficulties (39% v 28%) and comorbidities (76% v 67%). Fewer females were treated by specialists (49% v 59%; weakly associated with remission). Emotional/mental burden was similar (64% v 60%).
Pts in 2L Tx considered convenience to be more important than those in ≥3L (35% v 26%). Pts in ≥3L perceived their Tx and care to have a worse impact on mental health than expected (49% v 2L, 36%).
Only 13% of pts preferred HCPs to make Tx decisions alone (more so in pts <65 v ≥65 y [21% v 8%] and in 2L v ≥3L [17% v 10%]). However, HCPs reported recommending Tx without discussing pt goals in 22% of cases. Pts wanted more discussion on AEs and safety risks (42%), impact on mental health (42%), and possible impact of AEs on daily life (41%). HCPs reported discussing more topics than pts recalle
Conclusions:
Pt characteristics are associated with differing burdens, Tx goals, and experiences. Understanding this is vital to tailoring Tx choices to meet pt expectations.